Dismissed appeal upheld for inordinate delay without cause. Valid notice via affixture. Timely representation crucial.

The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal due to the inordinate delay in filing without reasonable cause. The notice served through affixture was deemed valid, and the assessee's contention of inadequate time for representation before the Assessing Officer was not substantiated. The dismissal of the appeal by the learned CIT (Appeals) was justified as time-barred, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and timely representation in tax assessment proceedings.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of notice served through affixture.
2. Adequacy of time given to the assessee for representation before the Assessing Officer.
3. Justification of dismissal of the appeal by the learned CIT (Appeals).

Issue 1: Validity of notice served through affixture
The appeal was filed against an order for the assessment year 2005-06. The assessee, who derived income from a rice sheller, failed to attend the assessment proceedings despite notices being served. The Assessing Officer passed an ex-parte assessment order under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, making additions to the income due to various reasons. The assessee contended that no sufficient time was given before the completion of the assessment. The learned CIT (Appeals) dismissed the appeal due to an inordinate delay of about 2 years in filing the appeal without reasonable cause. However, the Tribunal restored the matter for fresh adjudication. The notice was served through affixture as the assessee had left without providing an address. The learned CIT (Appeals) upheld the service of notice through affixture, stating that it was valid as per law. The assessee's appeal was dismissed as the delay in filing the appeal was not condoned.

Issue 2: Adequacy of time given to the assessee for representation before the Assessing Officer
The assessee argued that insufficient time was given to represent the case before the Assessing Officer after the notice was served through affixture. The counsel for the assessee claimed that only two days were left for proceedings before the Assessing Officer after the notice was affixed. However, the assessee did not make any effort to represent the case before the Assessing Officer within the given time frame. The Tribunal found no merit in the appeal, as the assessee failed to substantiate any contention regarding the lack of time for representation.

Issue 3: Justification of dismissal of the appeal by the learned CIT (Appeals)
The learned CIT (Appeals) dismissed the appeal as time-barred, as the notice and assessment order were served through affixture. The counsel for the assessee did not raise any other grounds on merit. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the learned CIT (Appeals) due to being time-barred, as no reasonable cause was explained for the delay in filing the appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee was consequently dismissed.

In conclusion, the judgment dealt with the validity of notice served through affixture, the adequacy of time given for representation before the Assessing Officer, and the justification of the dismissal of the appeal by the learned CIT (Appeals). The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of complying with procedural requirements and timely representation in tax assessment proceedings.

---