1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Revenue appeal dismissed for discrepancies in figures between records and bank statements.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. Discrepancies in figures between final ... Clandestine removal of goods - whether the difference in figures of final product/raw-materials as reflected in RG-I register and as reflected in the bank statements can lead to the findings of clandestine removal or not - Held that:- Admittedly, apart from difference, there is no other evidence on record indicating clearance of goods without payment of duty. As such, I find no infirmity in the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) - Decided against Revenue. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). The issue was whether differences in figures of final product/raw-materials in registers and bank statements indicate clandestine removal, but without corroborative evidence, such differences do not prove clandestine manufacture and removal.