Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference should be directed on the question whether the expenditure incurred for preparing and publishing the biography of a founder was charitable and entitled to exemption.
Analysis: The institution had long been recognised as charitable and approved, and the same expenditure for the same project had been accepted in earlier assessment years. The expenditure was incurred in furtherance of one of the principal objects of the trust, namely preparation and publication of biographical and research studies. In these circumstances, the Court held that it was not proper to reopen the same issue when there had been no change in law or in the nature of the activity.
Conclusion: No reference was called for and the application was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a charitable institution has consistently been accepted as such and incurs expenditure in furtherance of its principal charitable objects, the expenditure is charitable and a reference on that settled question need not be directed in the absence of any change in law or facts.