Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of service tax paid on port and CHA services used for export of goods was admissible under Notification No. 41/2007-ST dated 06.10.2007 despite objections regarding proof of payment and supporting documents.
Analysis: The claim related to services admittedly used for export and the invoices produced contained the requisite particulars, including service tax registration details, names, addresses and the tax amount charged. The notification did not require the claimant to prove that the service provider had separately discharged the tax liability to the Government. The only relevant requirement was proof that service tax had been paid on the specified services, which stood satisfied by the invoices and payment records. The rejection based on alleged mismatch of documents and insistence on an additional condition not found in the notification was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held to be admissible and the rejection order was set aside in favour of the assessee.