Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2015 (11) TMI 1493 - AT - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        SEBI Takeover Regulations: Joint Promoter Group Disclosure Obligation & Penalties The Tribunal held that the obligation to make yearly disclosures under the SEBI Takeover Regulations falls on the promoter group as a whole, not on ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            SEBI Takeover Regulations: Joint Promoter Group Disclosure Obligation & Penalties

                            The Tribunal held that the obligation to make yearly disclosures under the SEBI Takeover Regulations falls on the promoter group as a whole, not on individual promoters within the group. Penalties for non-disclosure should be imposed on the promoter group and recovered jointly from promoters holding shares or voting rights. The Tribunal criticized SEBI for inconsistent implementation of regulations and remanded the appeals for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of SEBI ensuring consistency in its regulatory approach.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Obligation to make yearly disclosure under Regulation 8(2) of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 and Regulation 30(2) of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.
                            2. Interpretation of the term "promoter" and whether it includes "promoter group".
                            3. Imposition of penalty for non-disclosure and whether it should be on individual promoters or the promoter group.
                            4. Consistency in the implementation of regulations by SEBI.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Obligation to Make Yearly Disclosure:
                            The core dispute in these appeals revolves around whether the obligation to make yearly disclosure under Regulation 8(2) of the 1997 Takeover Regulations and Regulation 30(2) of the 2011 Takeover Regulations falls on each individual promoter or on the promoter group as a whole. The Tribunal noted that both regulations use the term "promoter," which includes any person belonging to the promoter group as per the definitions provided in the respective regulations. Consequently, the obligation to make yearly disclosure should be interpreted as being on the promoter group, not on each individual promoter within the group.

                            2. Interpretation of the Term "Promoter":
                            The Tribunal emphasized that the term "promoter" as defined in both the 1997 and 2011 Takeover Regulations includes the "promoter group." This means that any obligation cast on the promoter is also cast on the promoter group. The Tribunal rejected SEBI's argument that the word "promoter" should be interpreted to mean each individual promoter, stating that such an interpretation would lead to absurd consequences, such as requiring disclosures from entities that do not hold any shares in the target company.

                            3. Imposition of Penalty:
                            The Tribunal addressed the issue of whether penalties for non-disclosure should be imposed on individual promoters or the promoter group. It was held that if the promoter group fails to make the required disclosures, the penalty should be imposed on the promoter group and recovered jointly and severally from the promoters within the group who hold shares or voting rights. The Tribunal criticized SEBI for the inconsistency in its approach, where in some cases penalties were imposed on individual promoters and in others on the promoter group.

                            4. Consistency in SEBI's Implementation:
                            The Tribunal expressed concern over SEBI's inconsistent implementation of the regulations and its failure to take a clear stand on the issue. The Tribunal highlighted that SEBI's indifferent attitude resulted in conflicting views among its Adjudicating Officers (AOs), which led to uncertainty and inconsistency in the application of the regulations. The Tribunal stressed the importance of SEBI ensuring consistency in the implementation of its regulations.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal concluded that the obligation to make yearly disclosures under Regulation 8(2) of the 1997 Takeover Regulations and Regulation 30(2) of the 2011 Takeover Regulations is on the promoter group. If the promoter group fails to make the disclosures, the penalty should be imposed on the promoter group and recovered jointly and severally from the promoters within the group who hold shares or voting rights. The Tribunal set aside the orders passed by SEBI's AOs and remanded the appeals back to SEBI for fresh consideration on merits, emphasizing the need for SEBI to ensure consistency in its regulatory approach.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found