Customs valuation of related-party imports depends on a proven nexus between royalty or service fees and the imported goods.

Customs valuation includes post-importation service fees or royalties only where a clear nexus with the imported goods is shown and the payment is a condition of their sale; absent that link, such amounts are not added to assessable value. Lump-sum technical assistance and engineering fees for localisation, process engineering, training and documentation were treated as services directed to vehicle manufacture rather than to the imported parts. Royalties under technology and trademark licences were also excluded where they related to local production or were not triggered on the imported goods. Related-party status alone does not justify rejection of transaction value unless price influence is proved.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the lump-sum fee paid under the technical assistance and engineering services agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported parts and components. (ii) Whether royalty payable under the technology licence agreement and the trademarks licence agreement was includible in the assessable value. (iii) Whether the transaction value of the imported goods could be rejected merely because the buyer and seller were related persons and no comparable identical goods value was shown.

Issue (i): Whether the lump-sum fee paid under the technical assistance and engineering services agreement was includible in the assessable value of the imported parts and components.

Analysis: The services covered localization, process engineering, training, technical documentation and related activities, and were directed to the manufacture and assembly of the licensed vehicles rather than to the imported parts themselves. The payment was a lump-sum remuneration for those services and was not shown to be part of the price of the imported goods or a condition of their sale. The requirement under the valuation rules is a nexus between the payment and the imported goods, together with a sale-condition link, which was not established on the facts.

Conclusion: The lump-sum services fee was not includible in the assessable value and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether royalty payable under the technology licence agreement and the trademarks licence agreement was includible in the assessable value.

Analysis: The royalty on licensed vehicles became payable only after production of a specified volume that was never reached, and the royalty on spare parts was linked to spare parts manufactured and sold in India, not to imported parts. The trademarks royalty was contractually absorbed within the technology licence royalty. In the absence of a demonstrated connection between these royalty payments and the imported goods, and without proof that they were a condition of sale of the imported parts, the valuation rules did not permit their inclusion.

Conclusion: The royalty payments under both agreements were not includible in the assessable value and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether the transaction value of the imported goods could be rejected merely because the buyer and seller were related persons and no comparable identical goods value was shown.

Analysis: Relationship alone does not displace the declared transaction value unless Revenue shows that the relationship influenced the price or adduces evidence to reject the invoice price. The record did not establish that the declared price was not the real price, and the absence of evidence of identical goods values did not by itself shift the burden to the importer to disprove transaction value. The declared value therefore remained acceptable under the valuation framework.

Conclusion: The transaction value could not be rejected on that basis, and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside, and the declared value of the imports was accepted without adding the disputed lump-sum fees or royalties to the assessable value.

Ratio Decidendi: Amounts paid for post-importation services or royalties are includible in customs valuation only when they are shown to relate to the imported goods and to be payable as a condition of their sale; absent such nexus, the declared transaction value cannot be disturbed merely because the parties are related.

---