Limitation barred the CENVAT demand on welding electrodes used for plant maintenance, leaving the credit issue undecided.

CENVAT credit on welding electrodes used for maintenance and repair of plant and machinery was disputed, together with whether the demand was hit by limitation. Because the notice covered a period beyond the normal limitation period and the issue had already generated conflicting views with reference to a Larger Bench, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. The demand was therefore held time-barred, and the Tribunal found it unnecessary to examine the substantive credit entitlement.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on welding electrodes used for maintenance and repair of plant and machinery, and whether the demand was barred by limitation.

Analysis: The dispute concerned entitlement to credit for welding electrodes used in maintenance and repair. The notice covered a period extending beyond the normal limitation period, and the issue had already been the subject of conflicting views and reference to a Larger Bench. In these circumstances, the extended period of limitation could not be invoked. The Tribunal found it unnecessary to examine the merits once limitation was decided in the appellant's favour.

Conclusion: The demand was held to be time-barred, and the appeal succeeded on limitation.

---