TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows Revenue's appeals, remands penalty issue to CIT(A)</h1> <h3>ITO, Ward-7 (1), Ahmedababad Versus Smt. Anandiben and Others</h3> ITO, Ward-7 (1), Ahmedababad Versus Smt. Anandiben and Others - TMI Issues:Appeals against deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2006-07.Analysis:1. Grounds of Appeal:The appeals were directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The common grounds raised by the Assessees included errors in law and facts by the CIT(A), questioning the basis of penalty levy, and seeking restoration of the Assessing Officer's order.2. Factual Background:The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings based on unexplained household expenditure and undisclosed capital gain. Subsequently, penalties were imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Assessees appealed to the CIT(A) who allowed the appeals, leading to the present appeals before the Tribunal.3. Judicial Review:During the proceedings, the Assessee's counsel referred to a Tribunal decision that remitted similar appeals back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT-DR did not object to this proposition. The Tribunal analyzed the orders of the authorities below and the Tribunal's decision, which directed the CIT(A) to delete the penalties imposed.4. Tribunal's Decision:The Tribunal noted that the very basis of the penalties did not survive due to the Tribunal's order remitting the appeals back to the CIT(A). Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the appeals to the CIT(A) for fresh decision in accordance with the law. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.5. Outcome:The Tribunal allowed all three appeals of the Revenue for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to decide afresh on the penalty issue. The order was pronounced in court on a specified date in Ahmedabad.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the grounds of appeal, factual background, judicial review, the Tribunal's decision, and the final outcome of the appeals, providing a comprehensive understanding of the legal issues involved in the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
