Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether dividend rebate under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowable on gross dividends without reducing them by proportionate management or other expenses. (ii) Whether a capital loss arising under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 could be carried forward and set off against capital gains in a later assessment year under the Income-tax Act, 1961, even though the loss had not been separately determined in the year of occurrence.
Issue (i): Whether dividend rebate under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowable on gross dividends without reducing them by proportionate management or other expenses.
Analysis: The right to relief on dividend income was examined in the light of the applicable rebate provisions and the existing judicial position. The governing principle accepted by the Court was that the rebate is computed on the gross dividend received and not on net dividend after deduction of proportionate expenses.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.
Issue (ii): Whether a capital loss arising under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 could be carried forward and set off against capital gains in a later assessment year under the Income-tax Act, 1961, even though the loss had not been separately determined in the year of occurrence.
Analysis: A capital loss under the head capital gains that arose when the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 applied was held to create a carry-forward right under section 24(2B) of that Act. On the coming into force of the Income-tax Act, 1961, section 74 preserved and regulated the manner of set-off, while section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 protected accrued rights. The Court further held that section 80 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not govern such pre-1962 capital losses and that neither Act imposed a requirement that the loss must have been ascertained in the year of origin before it could be carried forward.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.
Final Conclusion: The reference was substantially decided in favour of the assessee on both the dividend rebate and capital-loss carry-forward questions, while the remaining questions were not adjudicated because they became academic.
Ratio Decidendi: A capital loss arising under the repealed income-tax regime can be carried forward and set off in a later year if the earlier law conferred that right and the later law does not evince a contrary intention; the loss need not necessarily have been determined in the year of occurrence unless the statute expressly so requires. Dividend rebate, where allowed on gross dividends, is computed without deducting proportionate expenses unless the statute provides otherwise.