Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts of a joint development agreement, there was a "transfer" attracting capital gains under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and whether the connected claim for exemption under section 54F survived for consideration.
Analysis: The agreement was read along with the subsequent sale deeds and it was found that the arrangement contemplated only pro rata transfer of land. No possession of the entire land had been delivered in part performance so as to attract section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Any possession, if given, was only as a licensee for development and not as transferee. Since the agreement executed after 24.09.2001 was unregistered, the essential requirements of section 53A were not satisfied and, therefore, section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 did not apply. In view of the conclusion on transfer, the exemption issue under section 54F did not require separate adjudication.
Conclusion: No taxable transfer arose under section 2(47)(v), and the assessee was not liable to capital gains tax on the remaining land. The exemption issue was rendered academic.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 2(47)(v) to apply, the transaction must satisfy all essential ingredients of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, including valid possession in part performance and, where applicable, registration of the development agreement.