Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to avail Cenvat credit of countervailing duty paid through debit in DEPB scrips during the relevant period, in view of the EXIM Policy amendment and the accompanying notifications.
Analysis: The relevant period was July 2004 to September 2004. The policy restriction on DEPB, earlier found in the EXIM Policy, had been deleted by amendment with effect from 28.01.2004. The amended policy and the notifications governing the period permitted an importer to avail Cenvat credit of additional duty debited through DEPB, and the issue stood covered by binding High Court decisions holding that credit could not be denied on the basis suggested by the Revenue.
Conclusion: The appellant was eligible to avail Cenvat credit on the countervailing duty paid through DEPB debit, and the disallowance of credit was unsustainable.