Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the Tribunal remanding the matter for recalculation of duty after holding the service taxable and extending the benefit of the Board's Circular called for interference.
Analysis: The Tribunal had held that service tax was payable on the services rendered and had also held that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of the Board's Circular dated 31 October 1996. On that basis, it remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for recalculation of the duty payable and also left the question of personal penalty to be considered by that authority. In view of the remand and the limited nature of the relief granted by the Tribunal, there was no reason to interfere.
Conclusion: Interference was declined and the Department's appeals were dismissed.