Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was disentitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that it was a co-operative bank within the meaning of Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949; (ii) Whether the authorities under the Income-tax Act, 1961 were competent to decide whether the assessee was a co-operative society or a co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was disentitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the footing that it was a co-operative bank within the meaning of Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
Analysis: Section 80P(4) excludes only a co-operative bank from the deduction, while the expression "co-operative bank" takes its meaning from Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. A primary co-operative bank must satisfy all the statutory conditions, including that its bye-laws do not permit admission of any other co-operative society as a member. The finding recorded was that the assessee did not satisfy all the conditions for being treated as a primary co-operative bank. The assessee therefore remained a co-operative society carrying on the relevant activity, and the exclusion under Section 80P(4) did not apply.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i), and the denial of deduction was not justified.
Issue (ii): Whether the authorities under the Income-tax Act, 1961 were competent to decide whether the assessee was a co-operative society or a co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
Analysis: The Banking Regulation Act, 1949 contains an express provision that where a dispute arises as to the primary object or principal business of a co-operative society referred to in the relevant clauses, the determination by the Reserve Bank is final. In that statutory setting, the income-tax authorities could not conclusively assume jurisdiction to determine the disputed character of the assessee as a co-operative bank for purposes of Section 80P. Any view taken by them was only tentative until the Reserve Bank determined the controversy.
Conclusion: The income-tax authorities were not competent to finally decide the disputed banking-status question in the face of the statutory finality attached to the Reserve Bank's determination.
Final Conclusion: The statutory exclusion from deduction did not apply on the facts found, and the disputed character of the assessee could not be conclusively determined by the income-tax authorities alone.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of Section 80P(4), only a co-operative society that satisfies all the statutory ingredients of a primary co-operative bank is excluded from deduction, and where the Banking Regulation Act makes the Reserve Bank's determination final on the disputed character of the society, the income-tax authorities cannot finally decide that controversy themselves.