Appellate Tribunal allows Cenvat Credit despite supplier's revoked registration certificate

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the respondent's entitlement to Cenvat Credit based on invoices issued by a supplier whose registration certificate was later revoked. The Tribunal held that the respondent had complied with the relevant rules by taking Cenvat Credit during the period when the supplier had a valid registration certificate, even though it was later revoked. The Tribunal upheld the decision in favor of the respondent, dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue.

---

---

Issues:
Whether the respondent is entitled to Cenvat Credit based on invoices issued by a supplier whose registration certificate was later revoked.

Analysis:
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI involved a dispute regarding the entitlement of Cenvat Credit to the respondent based on invoices issued by a supplier, M/s. JOPL, whose registration certificate was revoked. The Revenue contended that the respondent did not comply with Rule 9(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 as they failed to verify the antecedents of M/s. JOPL. The Revenue argued that the respondent should not be entitled to take Cenvat Credit as the supplier did not have a valid registration certificate during the impugned period.

The Appellate Tribunal considered the submissions of both parties and analyzed the undisputed facts of the case. It was established that M/s. JOPL applied for registration on 12.08.2010 and was allotted a registration number on the same day. However, M/s. JOPL could not comply with the formalities, leading to the revocation of their registration on 21.09.2010. Despite this, M/s. JOPL had supplied goods to the respondent during this period based on Cenvitable invoices.

The Tribunal noted that at the time of supplying goods, M/s. JOPL had a valid registration certificate, which was later revoked. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the respondent had complied with the conditions of Rule 9(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 by taking Cenvat Credit based on the invoices issued by M/s. JOPL during the intervening period. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) in favor of the respondent.

In conclusion, the Tribunal found no infirmity with the impugned order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, ruling in favor of the respondent's entitlement to Cenvat Credit based on the invoices issued by M/s. JOPL during the period in question.

---