Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (11) TMI 395 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court affirms Tribunal decision on Revenue's appeals, stresses importance of independent tax inquiries The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It affirmed that the turnover determined by the Commissioner of Central ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          High Court affirms Tribunal decision on Revenue's appeals, stresses importance of independent tax inquiries

                          The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It affirmed that the turnover determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise should be adopted for determining the unaccounted turnover of the assessee. Additionally, the Court held that section 40A(3) cannot be applied when assessable income is determined by applying a percentage rate on the unaccounted turnover, as the gross profit rate already includes all expenditures. The Court stressed the importance of independent enquiry by tax authorities and the inadequacy of relying solely on findings from other departments without corroborative evidence.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the turnover determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise in his de novo adjudication proceedings can be adopted for determining the unaccounted turnover of the assessee.
                          2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of section 40A(3) cannot be applied when no deduction was sought on the expenditure and the assessable income was arrived at by applying a percentage rate on the unaccounted turnover.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Adoption of Turnover Determined by Commissioner of Central Excise:
                          The Revenue challenged the Tribunal's decision to adopt the turnover determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise for determining the unaccounted turnover of the assessee. The Tribunal's decision was based on the fact that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not conduct an independent enquiry and relied solely on the show-cause notice issued by the Central Excise Department. The Tribunal noted that the AO's reliance on the show-cause notice was improper, especially since the CESTAT had found the evidence unreliable and remanded the matter for de novo adjudication. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) had directed the AO to make independent enquiries, which were not carried out. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision to adopt the turnover determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise in the de novo order and to compute the gross profit accordingly, after giving deductions for power and labor charges. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that tax determination under the Income-tax Act must be based on independent enquiry and cogent material, not merely on the findings of another department.

                          2. Application of Section 40A(3):
                          The Tribunal also held that the provisions of section 40A(3) could not be applied when no deduction was sought on the expenditure, and the assessable income was determined by applying a percentage rate on the unaccounted turnover. The CIT(A) had relied on the judgment in CIT v. S. Mohammed Dhurabudeen, which held that when income is computed by applying a gross profit rate, there is no need to consider section 40A(3) for disallowance of expenditure. The Tribunal concurred with this view, noting that since the gross profit rate applied takes care of all expenditures, including purchases, there was no need for further scrutiny under section 40A(3). The High Court agreed with the Tribunal, reiterating that when income is estimated by applying a percentage rate, it encompasses all expenditures, and there is no need for additional disallowance under section 40A(3).

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, affirming the Tribunal's findings that:
                          1. The turnover determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise in the de novo adjudication proceedings should be adopted for determining the unaccounted turnover.
                          2. The provisions of section 40A(3) cannot be applied when the assessable income is arrived at by applying a percentage rate on the unaccounted turnover, as the gross profit rate applied already accounts for all expenditures.

                          The High Court emphasized the necessity of independent enquiry by the Income-tax authorities and the inadmissibility of relying solely on findings from other departments without corroborative evidence.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found