Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the agreement entered into by the petitioner with an Indian Government company for work to be executed in Kuwait qualified for approval under section 80-0 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, despite the immediate contracting party being an Indian company.
Analysis: Section 80-0 was applied having regard to its object of encouraging export of Indian technical know-how and earning of foreign exchange. The arrangement showed that the real employer was the Government of Kuwait, the services were rendered wholly in Kuwait, payments were made in foreign exchange in Kuwait, and the contractual terms and surrounding circumstances established that the agreement was bona fide and commercially real. A narrow or superficial reading based only on the nominal contracting party would defeat the statutory purpose. The substance of the transaction, not its external form, governed entitlement to approval.
Conclusion: The agreement satisfied the requirements of section 80-0 and approval could not be refused merely because the formal contract was with an Indian company.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 80-0, the decisive test is the real substance of the arrangement and the foreign character of the services and consideration, so a nominal Indian intermediary does not defeat approval where the technical services are rendered abroad for a foreign enterprise or government and foreign exchange is earned.