Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deed of partnership was invalid and registration under section 185 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be granted when one of the partners was found to be a minor on the date of execution of the deed.
Analysis: The finding that the partner was born on 27 September 1951 was treated as a finding of fact based on the evidence accepted by the Tribunal. On that finding, he was a minor when the deed of partnership was executed on 10 September 1966. A partnership deed admitting a minor as a full partner, sharing profits and losses, is invalid and cannot support registration. In a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the High Court was bound by the Tribunal's factual findings and could not reappraise the evidence in the absence of a specific question on perversity or absence of evidence.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in holding that the deed of partnership was an invalid document and that registration under section 185 could not be granted; the question was answered in the negative and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In a reference, the High Court must accept the Tribunal's findings of fact unless a specific legal issue challenging those findings is referred, and a partnership deed admitting a minor as a full partner is invalid for registration purposes.