Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to 75% abatement under Notification No. 32/2004-S.T. for GTA services and, consequently, whether the differential service tax demand and penalties could be sustained.
Analysis: The benefit under Notification No. 32/2004-S.T. applies to taxable services provided by a goods transport agency, subject to the stipulated conditions in the proviso. The record showed payment made to individual truck operators for transport of goods and no material establishing that the operators had taken credit of duty on inputs or capital goods or that the disqualifying conditions were otherwise attracted. The service tax liability of the recipient for GTA services was not in dispute, and the assessee had paid tax on 25% of the freight value after claiming the notified abatement.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/2004-S.T.; the demand for differential service tax and the penalties were not sustainable.