Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, particularly section 11(b)(ii) thereof, applied for determining the market value of vacant land held by the assessee in excess of the ceiling limit for wealth-tax purposes.
Analysis: For valuation under section 7 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the relevant test is the price the asset would fetch in the open market on the valuation date. The question whether the operation of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, and the restrictions created by it reduce the market value of excess vacant land, is not merely factual. The statutory scheme under sections 6, 8, 9 and 10 shows a staged process culminating in deemed acquisition only upon a declaration under section 10(3). Section 11, including section 11(b)(ii), becomes relevant after such deemed acquisition. The Court held that the applicability of those provisions to valuation in the present circumstances raised a question of law and the Tribunal ought to have referred it. The second suggested question was treated as factual and not fit for reference.
Conclusion: The reference was directed on the reframed question of law concerning the applicability of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, to valuation of the excess vacant land; the Revenue succeeded on the reference application.