Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts received by the assessee from the privy purse arrangement constituted income liable to tax under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Court adopted the reasoning previously applied in an identical reference and held that the receipts in question did not represent taxable income in the hands of the assessee. The Court treated the earlier decision as governing the present case and found no contrary authority from the Supreme Court or the same High Court to depart from that view.
Conclusion: The receipts of Rs. 60,000 each for the assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70 and Rs. 84,000 and Rs. 50,000 for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72 did not constitute the assessee's income liable to tax, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Receipts forming part of a privy purse arrangement, in the circumstances considered, do not automatically constitute taxable income under the Income-tax Act, 1961.