TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal quashes reassessment due to invalid reopening under Section 148, citing natural justice violation. Other issues deemed academic.</h1> <h3>KAMAL DHAWAN Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 27 (2), NEW DELHI</h3> KAMAL DHAWAN Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 27 (2), NEW DELHI - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of Reopening u/s 1482. Merits of the Case3. Violation of Principles of Natural JusticeIssue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Reopening u/s 148:The Assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment under Section 148, arguing that it was done in contravention of jurisdictional conditions stipulated under Sections 147 to 151 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessee contended that the reasons for reopening were not communicated before the conclusion of the assessment proceedings, which goes to the root of the matter and vitiates the entire proceedings. The Assessee emphasized that the reasons provided did not amount to reasonable belief and demonstrated a lack of application of mind and tangible material. The Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's argument, noting that the Assessee was not given an opportunity to rebut and confute the reopening and reasons recorded, as per the dictum of the Apex Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. ITO [2003] 259 ITR 19. The Tribunal highlighted that the sine qua non for issuance of a notice under Section 148 is the recording of reasons by the AO and furnishing a copy thereof to the Assessee when asked. The Tribunal also referenced the Delhi High Court's decision in Signature Hotels P. Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer [2011] 338 ITR 0051, which held that reassessment proceedings initiated without proper application of mind to the information received are invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings.2. Merits of the Case:The Assessee argued that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not deleting the addition of Rs. 7,49,000 made on the basis of conjectures, surmises, suspicion, and hearsay, whereas evidence on record adequately proved the Assessee's case. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case, as the reassessment proceedings were quashed on legal grounds, rendering the issue academic.3. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:The Assessee contended that the addition of Rs. 7,49,000 was made in violation of the principles of natural justice, as no adequate opportunity was provided to explain the case. The Tribunal found that the failure to communicate the reasons for reopening and to provide an opportunity to rebut the same constituted a violation of the principles of natural justice. This further supported the decision to quash the reassessment proceedings.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to the invalidity of the reopening under Section 148 and the violation of principles of natural justice. The other issues were not addressed as they became academic following the quashing of the reassessment proceedings. The order was pronounced in the Open Court on 28/9/2015.
TaxTMI 