TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether addition under section 68 could be sustained in respect of old unsecured cash credits reflected as brought forward balances from earlier years; (ii) Whether disallowance of interest paid to the creditors was liable to be deleted.
Issue (i): Whether addition under section 68 could be sustained in respect of old unsecured cash credits reflected as brought forward balances from earlier years.
Analysis: The credits were found to be old balances pertaining to years prior to the year under consideration. The appellate finding that they were merely brought forward balances was not displaced in remand. On the scheme of section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, an unexplained credit is taxable in the relevant previous year in which it is found credited, and the cited principle on prior-year credits supported the view that credits belonging to earlier years could not be brought to tax in the year under appeal.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not sustainable and the deletion was upheld, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether disallowance of interest paid to the creditors was liable to be deleted.
Analysis: No further material was brought to show that the interest payment was bogus or otherwise not genuine, and no infirmity in the appellate deletion was found.
Conclusion: The deletion of the interest disallowance was upheld, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed on all substantive grounds and the appellate deletion of the additions was maintained.
Ratio Decidendi: An addition under section 68 cannot be sustained in a later year where the credited amount is found to represent old brought forward balances pertaining to earlier years, and a related disallowance will not survive in the absence of material showing lack of genuineness.
TaxTMI 
