Penalty not warranted despite Larger Bench coverage where assessee's prior case had already dropped penalty.

Penalty was not sustained because, although the issue was covered against the assessee by a Larger Bench decision, the Tribunal relied on the assessee's own earlier case on the same point where penalty had been dropped. On those facts, it held that imposition of penalty was not justified and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order deleting penalty. The penalty issue was therefore decided in favour of the assessee, and both appeals were rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty was leviable in view of the Larger Bench decision on the identical issue.

Analysis: The dispute was covered against the assessee by a Larger Bench decision, but the Tribunal noted that in the assessee's own earlier case on the same issue, penalty had been dropped. In that view, the Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty was not justified and upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals).

Conclusion: Penalty was held to be not warranted and the order dropping penalty was sustained in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The penalty issue was finally decided against Revenue, resulting in rejection of both appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the issue stood covered by the Tribunal's larger bench and the matter did not justify penalty on the facts, penalty could not be sustained.

---