Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on coated pipes used as replacements in a gas pipeline transporting natural gas to the appellant's factory for manufacture of finished goods.
Analysis: The issue turned on whether the pipes, though laid outside the factory premises, were used in a pipeline directly connected with bringing an essential input to the factory for manufacture. The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been considered in earlier decisions, including the view that credit is available where pipes are used to bring water or other necessary material from an external source to the factory and are thus employed in or in relation to manufacture. Following that settled reasoning and the ratio relied upon by the earlier decisions, the Tribunal held that the factual position in the present matter was to those cases and that the credit could not be denied merely because the pipes were not physically within the factory.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the coated pipes was admissible and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit is allowable on pipes forming part of a pipeline that brings an essential material to the factory for manufacture, even if the pipes are located outside the factory, where they are used in or in relation to manufacture.