Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on capital goods is admissible when the capital goods are installed in adjacent unregistered premises and used for job work in the course of manufacture of the final products cleared from the main unit.
Analysis: The credit was denied on the premise that the capital goods were not installed within the registered premises of the main unit. The decisive facts were that the adjacent premises were part of the respondent's manufacturing arrangement, the capital goods were used for job work connected with the main unit, and the final products were cleared on payment of duty from the main unit. The Tribunal followed the principle that the expression "used in the factory" is satisfied where the capital goods form part of the manufacturing activity of the assessee and are employed in an integrated process for the final product, even if located in nearby unregistered premises, so long as the goods are not diverted or used extraneously.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the capital goods was admissible and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Capital goods used as part of an integrated manufacturing process for the assessee's final product remain eligible for credit even if installed in adjacent unregistered es, provided they are used for the manufacture of the duty-paid final products of the main unit.