Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had a prima facie case for dispensation of pre-deposit on the claim that the exemption notification applied to the manufacture of Niacin used within the factory in the production of Animal Feed Supplement.
Analysis: The appellant's final product was Animal Feed Supplement classified under Chapter 21 and the intermediate product Niacin fell under Chapter 29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The exemption under Notification No. 10/96-CE dated 23.07.1996, as amended, covered excisable goods consumed within the factory in the manufacture of Animal Feed. The issue was treated as covered by the Larger Bench decision in Tetragon Chemie and the affirmed Supreme Court ruling, along with other identical Tribunal decisions, supporting the appellant's claim at the prima facie stage.
Conclusion: The appellant established a good prima facie case and was entitled to dispensation of pre-deposit. The stay petition was allowed unconditionally in favour of the assessee.