Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the duty and penalty demand arising from classification of Silico Manganese slag.
Analysis: The alleged product was a refuse or residue emerging in the course of manufacture of Silico Manganese. On a prima facie view, Chapter Note 3 of Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 indicated that such refuse or residue, not used for extraction of metal or chemical compound, would not fall within the proposed tariff entry. The demand also related to a period prior to the amendment of Section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. These factors were sufficient at the interim stage to justify protection against recovery pending disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.