Appeal dismissed for income reclassification; remand for double taxation verification.

The appeal was dismissed regarding the reworking of income classification from capital gain to business due to the appellant withdrawing the ground of appeal during the hearing. In the matter of the addition of income from M/s. Chandan Carrier, the Tribunal remanded the case to the AO for reevaluation to confirm if the income was already included in the return to prevent double taxation. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of verifying income declarations and avoiding additional taxation.

---

---

Issues:
1. Changing the head of income from capital gain to business.
2. Addition made on account of income from M/s. Chandan Carrier.

Issue 1 - Changing the head of income from capital gain to business:
The appeal was filed against the order of the CIT(A)-II, Baroda, regarding the reworking of income based on the duration of shareholding. The appellant contested the direction to treat shares held for less than one month as business income and those held for more than one month as short-term capital gains. During the hearing, the appellant withdrew this ground of appeal, leading to its dismissal.

Issue 2 - Addition made on account of income from M/s. Chandan Carrier:
The AO observed that the appellant diverted income through M/s. Chandan Carrier to evade taxes. The appellant claimed that the transportation business was closed in January 2005, and the tankers were given to a relative for his transportation business. The CIT(A) rejected this claim, stating that no evidence was provided to prove the relative's legal competence to run the business. The appellant argued that the income from M/s. Chandan Carrier was already included in the return under section 44AE, preventing double taxation. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities did not verify this claim and remanded the matter to the AO for reevaluation. The Tribunal directed the AO to confirm if the income from M/s. Chandan Carrier was part of the declared income, potentially avoiding additional taxation. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the Tribunal addressed the issues of changing income classification and the addition of income from M/s. Chandan Carrier. The decision highlighted the importance of verifying income declarations and preventing double taxation, ultimately remanding the case for further assessment.

---