Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order levying tax and penalty on turnover relatable to discounts received from the supplier, without considering the Commissioner's circulars and Section 19(20) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and without granting due opportunity, was liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the treatment of discount-related amounts as taxable turnover. The assessment order did not refer to the Commissioner's circulars or to Section 19(20) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, although the circulars clarified that the provision was concerned with reversal of excess input tax credit and not with levy of tax on discounts, which had to be dealt with independently under the Act and on the facts of each case. The petitioner was also not afforded an effective opportunity to file objections before the order was passed. In these circumstances, the order could not stand and the matter required reconsideration after receiving objections and applying the relevant circulars and statutory provision.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration after receiving the petitioner's objections and granting due opportunity.