Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decisions on disallowance under Section 14A and interest expenditure as cost of improvement.

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The disallowance under Section 14A was correctly restricted, and the interest expenditure was rightly considered as cost of improvement.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act.
2. Deletion of disallowance of interest expenditure while computing long-term capital gain on account of cost of improvement.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act:

The Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A to Rs. 98,50,220/-, arguing that the Assessing Officer (AO) was bound to compute the disallowance as per Rule 8D, which is mandatory from AY 2008-09 onwards as held by the Bombay High Court in Godrej & Boyce. The AO had initially added Rs. 1,07,96,075/- to the assessee's total income for not disallowing any corresponding expenditure attributable to the tax-exempt dividend income of Rs. 5,41,828/-.

The CIT(A) observed that the assessee had not made any direct expenses to earn the dividend income and that the interest expenditure was attributable to business activities, not investment activities. The increase in investments during the year could not be related to borrowed funds, and the company had sufficient cash balance. Thus, the CIT(A) deleted the disallowance of indirect interest expenditure but upheld the disallowance of administrative and managerial expenses at Rs. 9,45,855/-.

The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s well-reasoned order and upheld the decision, noting that the department could not point out any new fact or law justifying interference.

2. Deletion of Disallowance of Interest Expenditure While Computing Long-term Capital Gain on Account of Cost of Improvement:

The AO had disallowed Rs. 1,23,02,586/- claimed by the assessee as cost of improvement under Section 48(ii) of the Act, arguing that interest on compensation paid does not qualify as cost of improvement under Section 55. The assessee had paid Rs. 4,69,52,055/- to Tropicana Properties Ltd. as interest over and above the principal payment to release properties from their lien, considering 25% of Rs. 4,16,00,000/- as cost of improvement.

The CIT(A) observed that the interest expenditure was related to obtaining clear title of the property, which was subsequently converted into stock-in-trade. The compensation of Rs. 8.14 crores and interest of Rs. 469.52 lakhs were necessary for relinquishing Tropicana's development rights, enhancing the property's value. Thus, the CIT(A) concluded that the interest expenditure was part of the cost of improvement and allowed it while computing the capital gains.

The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that the interest expenditure resulted in the enhancement of the property's value and the development rights became available to the assessee. Therefore, the interest expenditure was rightly considered as cost of improvement allowable while computing the capital gains.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The disallowance under Section 14A was correctly restricted, and the interest expenditure was rightly considered as cost of improvement. The order was pronounced in the open court on 09.09.2015.

---