Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deletion of the addition made on account of provision for gratuity and leave encashment was justified.
Analysis: The provision for gratuity and leave encashment had been supported by an actuarial certificate and was found to be based on a scientific methodology and reliable estimation. In such circumstances, the conditions for recognition of a provision, as laid down in the governing legal principle, were satisfied. The rectification order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 accepted that the earlier omission was an oversight and that the assessee's claim was covered by the binding principle governing recognition of provisions.
Conclusion: The addition was rightly deleted and the Revenue's challenge failed.