Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, where receivers carried on the business of a dissolved or disrupted firm on behalf of the persons beneficially entitled, the assessment was to be made in the status of an association of persons while the tax liability was to be determined only to the same extent and in the like manner as in the hands of the beneficiaries or represented persons under section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 for the earlier years and section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the later years.
Analysis: The relevant provisions dealing with representative assessees show that the assessment may be made on the representative in a representative capacity, but the tax is to be levied and recovered only to the same extent as it would be from the persons represented. The provisions are machinery provisions for collection and recovery and do not enlarge the substantive liability. The business in question was carried on through receivers on behalf of the persons having beneficial interests, and the principle applied in the earlier decisions on representative assessment supported the view that there could be one assessment for the profits of the business, but the burden of tax could not exceed the liability of the beneficiaries or represented persons.
Conclusion: Yes. The assessment could be made in the status of an association of persons, but the tax liability had to be determined only to the same extent and in the like manner as in the hands of the beneficiaries or represented persons under section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, like section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, is a machinery provision for representative assessment under which the tax payable by the representative assessee is co-extensive with, and cannot exceed, the liability of the person represented.