TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Allows Cenvat Credit for Welding Electrodes in Machinery Repair</h1> <h3>M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune</h3> M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune - TMI Issues: Admissibility of Cenvat Credit for welding electrodes used in repair and maintenance of machinery.Analysis:1. Legal Position: The appeal questioned the admissibility of Cenvat Credit for welding electrodes utilized in machinery repair and maintenance. The appellant argued that based on various judgments, including the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case, the credit should be allowed. They referenced precedents like CC & CE Vs. Ace Glass Container Ltd. and others to support their stance.2. Appellant's Argument: The appellant's counsel contended that the Cenvat credit on welding electrodes for machinery repair is permissible, citing the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case and other relevant judgments. They emphasized that the welding electrodes in question were indeed used for machinery repair and maintenance, making them eligible for credit.3. Revenue's Counter: The Revenue representative opposed the appellant's claim, citing conflicting judgments like Kisan Sahkari Chinni Mills Ltd. and others where Cenvat credit for welding electrodes was denied. They presented cases where such credit was disallowed, challenging the appellant's reliance on favorable judgments.4. Judgment: After evaluating the arguments and reviewing the cited judgments, the tribunal found that the issue of Cenvat Credit for welding electrodes in machinery repair has been extensively debated. Relying on the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case and its affirmation by the Supreme Court, the tribunal concluded that the credit is admissible if the electrodes are used for repair and maintenance purposes. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's reliance on conflicting judgments, clarifying that the legal position established by the Hindustan Zinc Ltd. case prevails. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal, affirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in machinery repair and maintenance.
TaxTMI 