Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether modvat credit on capital goods/components sent to job workers under Rule 57S of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be denied on the ground that the job workers returned completed machines and the value of the components was not includible for SSI exemption purposes.
Analysis: The appellant had supplied duty paid components to job workers for processing and re-working, and the goods were returned after such work. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that job workers were eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 214/86-CE. In that legal setting, the routing of components through job workers did not justify denial of modvat credit to the appellant. The objection based on alleged undervaluation and SSI exemption computation did not displace the settled position on eligibility for credit.
Conclusion: The denial of modvat credit was not justified and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.