Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on capital goods was admissible when the unit also undertook job work under Notification No. 214/1986-CE and cleared other consignments on payment of duty.
Analysis: The capital goods were used in the manufacture carried on by the unit, and the record showed that the respondent also cleared dutiable goods during the relevant period. The Commissioner (Appeals) had found that the presence of both dutiable and exempted activities did not justify denial of credit in the facts of the case. The Tribunal also noted that an identical issue in the respondent's own case for an earlier period had already been decided in favour of the respondent.
Conclusion: CENVAT credit could not be denied, and the Revenue's challenge to the order allowing credit failed.