TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Duty Payment Demand in Clandestine Removal Case</h1> <h3>M/s Sri Krishna Smelters Ltd. Versus Commissioner oif Central Excise, Salem</h3> M/s Sri Krishna Smelters Ltd. Versus Commissioner oif Central Excise, Salem - TMI Issues:- Application for waiver of predeposit of entire amount of dues- Allegation of clandestine removal of MS ingots without duty payment- Reliance on Supreme Court and High Court decisions- Adjudication based on electricity consumption charges- Confirmation of demand and penalty impositionAnalysis:The appellant filed an application seeking the waiver of predeposit of the entire amount of dues. The case involved allegations by the Department that the appellants had clandestinely removed MS ingots without paying duty between August 2006 and March 2011. The adjudicating authority issued a show-cause notice, confirming a demand of &8377; 15,37,46,735/- and imposing a penalty equal to the amount of &8377; 1,68,714/-. The appellant's counsel argued that the allegations were primarily based on high electricity consumption charges paid to the Tamilnadu Electricity Board, with no specific mention in the show-cause notice or adjudication order. The counsel relied on a Supreme Court decision and a Madras High Court decision in a similar case involving the Sales Tax Department.The Revenue's representative reiterated the allegations in the show-cause notice and adjudication order, highlighting periods with no recorded production but significant electricity charges paid. It was noted that clandestine removal was detected in August 2008, supported by a statement from the Managing Director admitting unaccounted production and payment of duty for clearance of MS ingots. After considering both arguments and examining the records, the Tribunal found the Managing Director's admission of clandestine removal during August 2008 to be credible, supported by substantial electricity consumption and payments to the Tamilnadu Electricity Board. The Tribunal deemed the appellant's reliance on Supreme Court and High Court decisions regarding sales tax as irrelevant to the current case. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for the waiver of predeposit of entire dues.As a result, the Tribunal directed the appellants to predeposit &8377; 1,50,00,000/-, with the first installment of &8377; 75,00,000/- to be paid within eight weeks and the second installment within four weeks thereafter. Compliance reporting deadlines were set accordingly. Upon the deposit of the specified amount, the predeposit of the remaining dues would be waived, and the recovery thereof stayed during the appeal's pendency.
TaxTMI 