Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit lying in RG-23A Pt. II was required to be reversed when the final products became exempt and whether the assessee was entitled to cash refund of the unutilised credit.
Analysis: The credit had been validly taken on inputs used in the manufacture of dutiable final products, but the final products later became exempt. The binding jurisdictional precedent applied by the Tribunal held that where the assessee is unable to utilise the credit because of subsequent exemption, the basis of the refund is not defeated and cash refund is permissible. On that reasoning, the credit was not liable to reversal merely because the final products subsequently became exempt under the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to cash refund of the Cenvat credit and the reversal was not required.