Tribunal decision: Assessee's appeal partially allowed, adjustments to arm's length price confirmed.

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, remanding certain issues for fresh examination. The adjustments to the arm's length price for software services were confirmed, with some comparables rejected and others included. The denial of the +/-5% benefit and reduction of deduction under section 10A were upheld partially. The disallowance of accrued liability on leave encashment and foreign exchange fluctuation loss was also upheld. The department's appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions on various adjustments.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the reference made by the AO to the TPO under section 92CA(3).
2. Adjustment to the arm's length price (ALP) for software services and other services.
3. Rejection and inclusion of comparables in the Transfer Pricing (TP) analysis.
4. Denial of the benefit of +/-5% mentioned in the proviso to section 92C(2).
5. Reduction of deduction claimed under section 10A.
6. Disallowance of accrued liability on account of leave encashment under section 43B(f).
7. Disallowance of foreign exchange fluctuation loss.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reference to TPO:
The assessee contended that the reference made by the AO to the TPO under section 92CA(3) was invalid as the AO did not record any reasons. However, this issue was not pressed during the hearing and was therefore rejected.

2. Adjustment to ALP:
The primary dispute revolved around the adjustment of Rs. 11,00,92,376 to the ALP for software services provided to associated enterprises (AEs). The CIT(A) confirmed this adjustment, rejecting the TNMM analysis by the assessee and using data not available at the time of documentation. The CIT(A) also rejected certain comparables selected by the assessee and included others, leading to the final adjustment. The assessee's appeal on this ground was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with certain issues remanded back to the AO/TPO for fresh examination.

3. Rejection and Inclusion of Comparables:
The CIT(A) and TPO had disagreements over the comparability of various companies. Key points included:
- Aftek Infosys Ltd.: The matter was remanded to the AO to verify if the company was only a software product company.
- Infosys Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to diversified functions and ownership of proprietary products.
- Satyam Computers Services Ltd.: Excluded due to unreliable financial data.
- Xansa India Ltd.: Remanded to CIT(A) for fresh decision based on RPT/Sales ratio.
- Geodesic Information Systems Ltd.: Remanded to TPO for fresh examination.
- Ecosoft Technologies Ltd., Compudyne Winfosystems Ltd., Orient Information Technology Ltd.: Remanded to CIT(A) for fresh examination with available current year data.

4. Denial of +/-5% Benefit:
The CIT(A) upheld the denial of the +/-5% benefit mentioned in the proviso to section 92C(2) as the assessee did not propose any scientific methodology for risk adjustment.

5. Reduction of Deduction under Section 10A:
The AO reduced the deduction claimed under section 10A from Rs. 12,60,73,272 to Rs. 12,56,84,892, excluding certain service receipts from the total turnover. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee's claim, including IT support services but excluding PR, supply chain, CT head, and SMG services. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's ground, holding that these services are part of back-office operations and support services.

6. Disallowance of Leave Encashment under Section 43B(f):
The AO disallowed Rs. 53,08,491 representing accrued liability on account of leave encashment under section 43B(f). The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, rejecting reliance on the Calcutta High Court decision in Exide Industries Ltd. v. UOI, as it was stayed by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's ground, following the specific mandate of section 43B.

7. Disallowance of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation Loss:
The AO disallowed Rs. 1,25,85,932 on account of foreign exchange fluctuation loss, considering it a notional loss. The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's claim, following the ITAT Special Bench decision in ONGC Ltd. and the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the department's appeal.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal's order resulted in partial relief for the assessee, with several issues remanded for fresh examination. The appeals for AY 2003-04 and 2004-05 were disposed of with directions for reassessment of certain comparables and adjustments. The department's appeals were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions on foreign exchange fluctuation loss and other adjustments.

---