Catalyst is not raw material where it remains unconsumed and outside the final product, preserving exemption eligibility.

Vanadium Pentoxide used by a 100% Export Oriented Unit was held to be a catalyst, not a raw material, for conditional exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE and Notification No. 23/03-CE. The Court noted that a raw material is not every ingredient used in manufacture: the substance here accelerated the chemical reaction, remained unaltered, retained its independent character, was not consumed in the process, and did not form part of the final product. Applying the approach in Ballarpur Industries, the classification depended on the facts, and the catalyst could not be equated with raw material. The concessional benefit was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether Vanadium Pentoxide used in the manufacture of excisable goods by a 100% Export Oriented Unit was a raw material so as to disentitle the assessee from the benefit of Notification No. 8/97-CE dated 01.03.1997 and Notification No. 23/03-CE dated 31.03.2003.

Analysis: The benefit of the notifications depended on whether the goods were manufactured only from raw material produced or manufactured in India. Vanadium Pentoxide was found to function only as a catalyst: it influenced and accelerated the chemical reaction, but remained uninfluenced and unaltered, retained its independent character, did not form part of the end product, and was not consumed in the process. The expression "raw material" was not treated as covering every ingredient used in manufacture. The earlier decision in Ballarpur Industries clarified that ingredients used in chemical manufacture may fall into different categories and that each case must depend on its own facts. On the facts here, the catalyst could not be equated with raw material.

Conclusion: Vanadium Pentoxide was not a raw material, and the assessee was entitled to the concessional benefit under the notifications.

Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view granting the exemption benefit to the assessee was upheld and the appeals failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A catalyst that remains outside the end product, is not consumed in manufacture, and retains its independent character does not constitute raw material for the purpose of conditional exemption notifications.

---