Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 when goods were cleared to garment manufacturers/exporters under the notified export procedure, and whether failure to produce shipping bills, bill of lading and related export documents in the assessee's own name disentitled the refund.
Analysis: The goods were supplied to registered garment manufacturers under Notification No. 43/2001-CE (N.T.) dated 26.06.2001 and under the procedure governing procurement of excisable goods for manufacture of export goods. The record showed that the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner had certified the procurement, the garment manufacturers had executed bond, and the finished goods were exported by them without claiming drawback. The documentary conditions in Notification No. 11/2002 were held inapplicable to the assessee because it was not the direct exporter. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier decisions on the same issue to hold that the assessee could not be denied refund merely because the export documents stood in the name of the garment exporter.
Conclusion: The assessee was eligible for refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.