Appeal granted: Capital gains from share sale not business income. Consistency key.

The tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the AO's decision to treat short-term capital gains from the sale of shares as business income. Emphasizing consistency in treatment of transactions and the investor's intention, the tribunal relied on past assessments and judicial precedents. The disallowance of expenses was not elaborated upon, with the main focus on the share transactions' classification. The order was pronounced on 7th August 2015.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Treatment of income from the sale of shares as business income versus short-term capital gains.
2. Disallowance of 20% of telephone expenses.
3. Disallowance of 20% of fuel and car maintenance expenses.
4. Disallowance of 20% of depreciation on assets forming part of the block of assets.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Treatment of Income from Sale of Shares:
The primary issue was whether the income from the sale of shares amounting to Rs. 1,07,24,457 should be treated as business income or short-term capital gains. The assessee argued that he was an investor in shares, consistently offering long-term and short-term capital gains in previous years, which were accepted by the department. The AO, however, treated the short-term capital gains as business income for the assessment year 2006-07, while accepting the long-term capital gains. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision.

The tribunal noted that the assessee was engaged in the business of import and export of marble and granite and had a consistent history of treating share transactions as investments. The tribunal referred to several judicial pronouncements, including the Bombay High Court's decision in Gopal Purohit, which upheld the principle of consistency in treating share transactions as investments. The tribunal also considered factors such as the volume and frequency of transactions, the intention behind purchasing shares, and the treatment of shares in the assessee's books. It concluded that the AO's decision to treat the short-term capital gains as business income was not justified, especially given the consistent treatment of similar transactions in previous years.

2. Disallowance of 20% of Telephone Expenses:
The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 33,256, which was 20% of the telephone expenses, arguing that it was based on conjectures and surmises and was excessive. The tribunal did not provide a detailed analysis of this issue in the judgment, implying that the primary focus was on the treatment of share transactions.

3. Disallowance of 20% of Fuel and Car Maintenance Expenses:
Similarly, the assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 25,610, which was 20% of the fuel and car maintenance expenses. The tribunal did not elaborate on this issue, focusing instead on the main issue of the treatment of income from share transactions.

4. Disallowance of 20% of Depreciation:
The assessee also contested the disallowance of 20% of the depreciation on assets forming part of the block of assets. The tribunal did not delve into this issue in detail, indicating that the main contention was regarding the classification of income from share transactions.

Conclusion:
The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the AO's decision to treat the short-term capital gains as business income. It emphasized the importance of consistency in the treatment of similar transactions and the intention of the assessee while making investments. The tribunal's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the facts, previous assessments, and relevant judicial pronouncements.

Order Pronouncement:
The order was pronounced in the open court on 7th August 2015.

---