TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Customs Duty Appeal Dismissed for Aluminium Scrap Import: Consent to Enhanced Value Key.</h1> <h3>M/s. Grand Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus C.C., Amritsar</h3> M/s. Grand Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus C.C., Amritsar - TMI Issues:- Appeal against Order-in-Appeal dated 10.12.2009 rejecting appellant's appeals.- Appellant imported aluminium scrap ISRI TENSE and filed four Bills of Entry.- Assessing Officer enhanced value based on DOV alert, appellant paid duty without protest.- Commissioner (Appeals) rejected appeals, citing appellant's consent to enhanced value.- Appellant contended lack of evidence, Customs Valuation Rules application, no acceptance of enhanced value, right to appeal, and cited relevant case laws.- Departmental Representative argued against appellant's right to contest after consenting.- Tribunal analyzed consent by CHA, appellant's knowledge, consent, and impact on Revenue's valuation process.- Tribunal referred to case laws, including Dunlop India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and CC, New Delhi Vs. D.M. International.- CESTAT's judgment in Vikas Spinners case highlighted the legal implications of accepting loaded value without protest.- Tribunal dismissed the appeals based on analysis and legal precedents.The judgment revolves around an appeal against the rejection of appellant's appeals concerning the import of aluminium scrap ISRI TENSE and the assessment of Customs Duty. The Assessing Officer enhanced the value based on a DOV alert, which the appellant agreed to without protest. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeals, emphasizing the appellant's consent to the enhanced value. The appellant raised various contentions, including lack of evidence, application of Customs Valuation Rules, and cited relevant case laws like Dunlop India Ltd. Vs. Union of India. The Departmental Representative argued against the appellant's right to contest post-consent. The Tribunal analyzed the consent by the CHA, appellant's knowledge, and impact on Revenue's valuation process. Referring to legal precedents and CESTAT's judgment in Vikas Spinners case, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals, citing the legal implications of accepting loaded value without protest. The judgment underscores the significance of consent in valuation disputes and its legal consequences on subsequent challenges.
TaxTMI 