Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled, in an appeal against the assessment year 2001-02, to seek recalculation of notional tax liability for earlier assessment years 1997-98 to 1999-2000 which had attained finality and were not the subject matter of the revisional proceedings.
Analysis: The appeal arose under Section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 from revisional action under Section 40 of the Act. The assessee had obtained exemption under Rule 28A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975, and the dispute before the revisional authority concerned the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal found that the request for recalculation of tax liability for the earlier years related to assessments that had never been challenged and had attained finality. Since those years were not in issue in the present proceedings, and the plea had not been raised before the revisional authority, the Tribunal declined to entertain it. The High Court found no perversity or legal error in that reasoning and held that no substantial question of law arose.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to seek recalculation of notional tax liability for the earlier assessment years in this appeal, and the challenge failed.