Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Keo Karpin Baby Oil was classifiable as a medicine or drug and taxable at the lower rate, or as a cosmetic taxable at the higher rate under the Rajasthan sales tax notification.
Analysis: The rate notification issued under section 5 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 separately prescribed entries for medicines and cosmetics. The Court noted that the Revenue had not discharged the burden of proving that the product fell within the cosmetic entry, as no material regarding its ingredients, label, or literature had been properly considered by the assessing or appellate authorities. The product had already been treated as a medicine or drug on the basis of earlier judicial findings, including its chemical composition, manufacture under a drug licence, and prophylactic qualities. The Court also applied the principle that in tax matters, an earlier settled view is ordinarily followed when the facts and law remain the same.
Conclusion: Keo Karpin Baby Oil was rightly treated as a medicine or drug, not as a cosmetic, and the revision challenge failed.