Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether epoxy resin and agar used in polishing granite slabs were consumables and not raw materials, so as to remain eligible for the exemption benefit claimed by the assessees.
Analysis: The applicable test is whether the ingredient goes into the making of the end-product in the sense that, without it, the presence of the end-product is rendered impossible, and whether it is used in the manufacturing process rather than as part of the manufacturing apparatus. On the facts, the disputed materials were used only for filling fissures, pores and cracks in a limited number of slabs, did not remain with the polished granite, and were eliminated during polishing. The Board circulars and the clarifications issued by the Development Commissioners supported the view that such items were consumables. The earlier decisions applying the same test to similar processing materials were held to govern the present cases.
Conclusion: Epoxy resin and agar were held to be consumables and not raw materials, and the denial of exemption was set aside. The assessees succeeded and the revenue appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A material used in the manufacturing process which does not form part of the finished product and is eliminated before the product emerges is to be treated as a consumable, not a raw material, for exemption purposes.