Tribunal recalls orders citing Apex Court judgment, highlights importance of procedural fairness and natural justice principles.

The Tribunal recalled its orders after four years without notice, citing an Apex Court judgment on COD clearance. Despite Revenue's arguments, the Tribunal found a lack of due process, violating natural justice principles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fairness, invoking relevant rules to rectify the situation and restore the orders. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to procedural fairness and upholding natural justice principles in legal proceedings, resulting in the recall of the Tribunal's earlier orders.

---

---

Issues:
1. Tribunal's power to recall orders after four years.
2. Violation of principles of natural justice in recalling orders without notice.

Issue 1: Tribunal's power to recall orders after four years:
The assessee filed petitions seeking to recall the Tribunal's order dated 18.4.2013. The representative argued that the Tribunal lacked the authority to recall orders after four years without the Revenue's application and without giving the assessee an opportunity. Citing various judgments, the representative contended that once the COD approval was denied, the order could not be recalled. The Tribunal recalled its orders based on the Apex Court's judgment that COD clearance was not necessary for appeals. The Tribunal's decision to recall the orders after four years without notice was challenged, asserting that the principles of natural justice were violated. The Tribunal found that the applications filed by the Revenue were not numbered or taken on record before the order was passed, indicating a lack of due process. Despite arguments from the Revenue representative, the Tribunal held that the order was passed without giving the assessee a chance to be heard, leading to a violation of natural justice. Therefore, the Tribunal recalled its earlier orders and restored them.

Issue 2: Violation of principles of natural justice in recalling orders without notice:
The Tribunal's decision to recall its orders without issuing notice to the assessee was a key point of contention. The representative for the Revenue argued that the Tribunal's action was justified based on the subsequent Apex Court judgment regarding COD clearance. However, the Tribunal acknowledged that it should have issued notice to the assessee before passing the order. The Tribunal noted that the applications filed by the Revenue were not formally processed before the order was issued, indicating a lack of procedural fairness. Despite the Revenue's arguments, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice. The Tribunal invoked Rule 24 and Rule 25 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, to rectify the situation and recalled its earlier orders, emphasizing the need for fairness and due process. The Tribunal concluded that the order was passed without affording the necessary opportunity to the parties involved, resulting in a violation of natural justice principles.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment in this case addressed the issues surrounding its power to recall orders after an extended period and the importance of upholding principles of natural justice in legal proceedings. The decision highlighted the need for procedural fairness and adherence to rules governing such matters, ultimately leading to the recall of the Tribunal's earlier orders.

---