Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court addresses breach of natural justice principles, allows late submissions under Regulation 16.</h1> <h3>CA. A. Siddharth Versus The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and another</h3> The Court acknowledged the breach of natural justice principles due to the non-supply of written submissions to the Petitioner, leading to an offer by the ... Disciplinary proceedings against the chartered accountant (CA) - non-supply of the written submissions by Respondent No.2 to the Petitioner / CA - principles of natural justice - Held that:- Non-supply of the written submissions by Respondent No.2 to the Petitioner would result in using the material, of which the Petitioner had no opportunity to meet. The same would not be permissible as per the principles of natural justice. However, in order to meet the principles of natural justice, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 fairly conceded that the said error would be rectified and the Petitioner will be given copies of the said statement so that he can meet the contentions raised therein. As per Regulation 16 the disciplinary committee is required to submit its report to the council. As per clause (2) of the Regulation where a finding of the disciplinary committee is against a person against whom the enquiry is conducted, a copy of the report of the disciplinary committee is required to be furnished to such a candidate and he is entitled to be given an opportunity of making a representation in writing to the council. No doubt that clause (2) of Regulation 16 only refers to the Respondent that is the person against whom an enquiry is being conducted for giving a copy of the report of the disciplinary committee so that he has an opportunity of making a representation. However, by now it is settled principle of law that every order which has an adverse effect has to be preceded by principles of natural justice, when the provision expressly or by necessary implication excludes the applicability of the same. In ordinary course we would have very well disposed of the Petition by accepting a fair and reasonable proposal as given by Respondent No.1. However, as Mr. Seervai has insisted upon interpretation of Regulation 16, we have admitted the matter. If the interim relief as sought is granted, it would be forestalling the enquiry proceedings against the Petitioner. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to grant interim relief as prayed for. However, we make it clear that the further enquiry shall be subject to the result of the Petition. Issues:1. Interpretation of Regulation 16 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 regarding reconsideration and procedural irregularities.2. Non-supply of written submissions causing prejudice and violation of principles of natural justice.3. Permissibility of Respondent No.2 filing submissions in the proceedings under Regulation 16.4. Application of principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner.Analysis:1. The Petitioner challenged an order seeking reconsideration under Regulation 16, alleging procedural irregularities and lack of reasons for reconsideration. The Petitioner argued that the order violated Regulation 16 and caused prejudice due to non-supply of Respondent No.2's written submissions. The Respondent offered to rectify the error by providing the Petitioner with the submissions, but the Petitioner rejected the offer.2. The Court acknowledged that non-supply of written submissions to the Petitioner breached natural justice principles, as it deprived the Petitioner of the opportunity to respond to the material presented. The Respondent agreed to rectify this error by providing the Petitioner with the submissions for a fair process.3. The central issue was whether allowing Respondent No.2 to file submissions under Regulation 16 was permissible. The Court examined the procedure outlined in Regulation 16, emphasizing the right of the Respondent to receive the report and make representations. The Court noted that natural justice principles must precede any adverse order, even if not explicitly stated in the regulation.4. The Court determined that seeking views from Respondent No.2, the complainant, did not violate natural justice principles. It was deemed appropriate for Respondent No.1 to consider the complainant's perspective in the proceedings. The Court opined that this approach aligned with natural justice and would not prejudice the Petitioner. While inclined to accept the Respondent's proposal, the Court admitted the matter due to the Petitioner's insistence on interpreting Regulation 16.5. Despite declining interim relief to the Petitioner, the Court clarified that the further inquiry would be subject to the outcome of the Petition. This decision aimed to ensure a fair process while addressing the issues raised regarding Regulation 16 and the application of natural justice principles in the disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found