TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows Cenvat Credit on services used by head office, citing procedural adherence and relevant precedents.</h1> <h3>M/s National Engineering Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I</h3> M/s National Engineering Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I - TMI Issues:Appeal against denial of Cenvat Credit by Jaipur unit due to head office not being registered as input service distributor.Analysis:The appellant, a manufacturer of Ball Bearing with units in Jaipur, Manesar, and Newai, appealed against the denial of Cenvat Credit by Jaipur unit for services like Selling Commission, Royalty, etc. The Revenue contended that as the head office was not registered as an input service distributor, Jaipur unit was not entitled to the credit. The dispute revolved around whether the appellant could avail Cenvat Credit on services used by the head office without registration. The appellant argued that lack of registration did not affect credit entitlement, citing precedents like Demosha Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Doshion Ltd. The Revenue opposed, citing rules and cases like Nicholas Piramal (India) Ltd. and Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd.The Tribunal examined whether the appellant could claim Cenvat Credit for services used by the head office without registration. Referring to Demosha Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal held that lack of registration as an input service distributor did not bar the appellant from availing credit. The Tribunal distinguished cases cited by the Revenue, emphasizing that proper procedure adherence was crucial. Relying on Demosha Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Doshion Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the appellant rightly claimed Cenvat Credit on various services. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.This judgment clarifies that lack of registration as an input service distributor does not automatically disentitle an entity from claiming Cenvat Credit on services utilized by the head office. It underscores the importance of following proper procedures and aligning with relevant precedents to determine credit eligibility. The decision provides guidance on interpreting Cenvat Credit rules concerning service usage and registration, ensuring fair treatment for taxpayers seeking credit benefits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
