Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether polyester filament yarn of 1 kg or less, arising during the spinning process and treated by the assessee as waste, was excisable as yarn and liable to central excise duty.
Analysis: The disputed quantity arose at the machine stage, but the surrounding record, including contemporaneous correspondence, stock verification, and field officers' observations, showed that the assessee treated such partially wound material as waste and not as marketable yarn. The factual finding recorded by the Tribunal was that the material was not cleared as yarn but was disposed of as waste, and that the Revenue's own officers had treated the yarn-stage residue as waste in their dealings with the factory. On that basis, the Tribunal concluded that the entire quantity recorded in the log sheets could not be assumed to have been removed as dutiable yarn.
Conclusion: The material of 1 kg or less was rightly treated as waste and not as excisable yarn; the demand of duty was not sustainable.