Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product manufactured from stone aggregates, cement, water and sand was classifiable as dry mixture or ready mix concrete, and whether the relevant tariff classification was under Heading 3823 (now 3824).
Analysis: The product classification had already been decided in favour of the assessee in earlier CESTAT proceedings and that view had been affirmed by the Court for the period prior to 01.03.1997. The Department had also accepted the position, and a subsequent circular of the Central Board of Excise and Customs reiterated the same classification. In that background, the Court found no justification for the later departmental appeal.
Conclusion: The product remained classifiable consistently with the earlier settled view, and the challenge by the Revenue was rejected.